
China Initiates WTO Dispute Against US Over Electric Vehicle Subsidies
China initiated WTO dispute against the US over electric vehicle subsidies, claiming they discriminate against Chinese goods, seeking fair competition.

China has taken the initiative to challenge the United States at the World Trade Organization (WTO) over subsidies in the electric vehicle industry. The dispute stems from China's concerns about "discriminatory subsidies" provided under the U.S. Inflation Reduction Act (IRA), which China alleges has resulted in the exclusion of goods from China and other WTO countries.
According to the Chinese mission, the subsidies provided under the IRA are conditional upon the purchase and use of goods from the United States or imported from specific regions. This, China argues, has created an uneven playing field in the global market, particularly impacting the Chinese electric vehicle industry. China has stated that its goal in launching these proceedings is to safeguard the legitimate interests of its electric vehicle industry and ensure fair competition on the global stage.
Response from the U.S.
In response, U.S. Trade Representative Katherine Tai confirmed that Washington is reviewing China's request for WTO consultations regarding parts of the IRA and its implementing measures. Tai defended the IRA, stating that it is contributing to a "clean energy future" and accused China of leveraging unfair, non-market policies to benefit Chinese manufacturers.
WTO Involvement
The WTO has confirmed the receipt of China's request for dispute consultations, although specific details have not been provided. If the dispute proceeds to an adjudication panel, WTO rulings on trade disputes typically take around six months to be finalized, although delays are not uncommon.
Potential Outcomes
If the WTO rules in favor of China, the United States could appeal the decision. However, the appeals process has faced challenges since December 2019, when the WTO's top appeals bench ceased to function due to U.S. opposition to judge appointments. The United States has been advocating for reforms to the Appellate Body, citing overreach, but negotiations face significant obstacles.
Future Implications
The outcome of this dispute could have far-reaching implications for the electric vehicle industry and trade relations between the U.S. and China. Both parties' positions will likely continue to evolve as the dispute progresses through the WTO's dispute settlement process.
Share news