
Democrats Warn of NOAA Space Office Cuts' Threat to US Leadership
House Democrats are criticizing NOAA layoffs at its Office of Space Commerce, arguing they threaten U.S. leadership in space and potentially benefit Elon Musk's SpaceX.

Top Democrats on the House Science, Space and Technology Committee are raising serious concerns about significant cuts to NOAA's Office of Space Commerce (OSC), which they argue threaten U.S. leadership in the commercial space sector.
The OSC is responsible for managing commercial and military satellite traffic, licensing and regulating commercial satellite systems, and playing a crucial role in preventing collisions in orbit. While relatively small, it has gained attention in Washington as a key government office for commercial space companies.
Cuts Impacting Key Personnel
According to multiple sources, the OSC's already limited team suffered a blow in late February with the initial round of layoffs at NOAA, losing eight employees, representing approximately 30% of its staff. Although three leadership staffers were subsequently brought back, lawmakers remain deeply worried about the lasting impact on the office.
Lawmakers are now calling for the reinstatement of all fired employees within the OSC permanently.
Legal Battles and Congressional Pushback
Earlier this month, a federal court ruling blocked the firings, leading to the placement of the affected employees on administrative leave. In a letter addressed to Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick, lawmakers including Ranking Member Zoe Lofgren of California, expressed their concerns about the potential consequences of these actions.
The letter, obtained by CBS News, highlights the risk of compromising the OSC's public safety programs and the potential for harm to U.S. leadership in space. It also raises questions about a possible conflict of interest given Elon Musk's involvement as both a Trump advisor and CEO of SpaceX, which holds a significant stake in the commercial space sector.
Concerns Over Impact on US Space Leadership
"If OSC is gutted, the harm to America's economy, its national security, and its public safety will leave everyone worse off — except perhaps for SpaceX, whose size and scale will allow it to mitigate the damage done to the rest of the commercial space sector," the letter states.
It further argues that SpaceX, as the largest and most profitable commercial satellite operator, is already positioned to withstand market disruptions, unlike its smaller rivals who could be significantly impacted by these cuts.
The letter is co-signed by Democratic House members Valerie Foushee of North Carolina, the Ranking Member of the Subcommittee on Space and Aeronautics; and Emilia Sykes of Ohio, the Ranking Member of the subcommittee on Investigations & Oversight.
Former NOAA Officials Voice Discontent
Former NOAA officials have also criticized the steep cuts to the OSC. Admiral Timothy Gallaudet, who served as acting administrator of NOAA during the first Trump administration, called the cuts "self-defeating," emphasizing that the office was established to support a growing commercial space sector.
Gallaudet, now a consultant for space companies, told CBS News, "One of our goals, broadly, was to support these growing tech industries. One of them was space, and we grew. If that office has employees fired, that means it's going to take more time for them to issue licenses to new companies." He stressed the importance of the OSC in facilitating the growth of the commercial space industry.
Policy Divergence and Calls for Elevation
Project 2025, a conservative policy playbook from the Heritage Foundation, even advocated for Republicans to "elevate" the Office of Space Commerce, stating that it should be the vehicle for a new administration to establish a robust and comprehensive space policy. This divergence in viewpoints highlights the ongoing debate surrounding the role and importance of the OSC within the broader context of U.S. space initiatives.
Impact on International Relations
Cole Brand, a former OSC employee, pointed out the loss of expertise in EU law and regulation following the layoffs. He stated, "We had been helping U.S. companies navigate that process." This suggests that the cuts could also have implications for international collaborations and trade in the space sector.
Congressional Inquiries and Calls for Transparency
Committee Democrats have sought answers from Secretary Lutnick regarding the assessment of impacts on the U.S. space industry before the firings took place. They have also inquired about any communications between SpaceX representatives and officials from the Department of Commerce, NOAA, or the Office of Space Commerce.
Furthermore, lawmakers want to know whether the OSC will be compelled to grant DOGE access to proprietary data from SpaceX competitors, raising concerns about potential conflicts of interest and the implications for fair competition within the industry.
"These unprecedented conflicts of interest threaten to destabilize the entire U.S. commercial space sector if they are not immediately addressed," the letter concludes.
Share news