Disbarred Lawyer Tom Girardi Convicted of Embezzling Millions from Clients, Faces 80-Year Sentence

In a landmark case that has captured the attention of the public and legal community alike, former high-profile attorney Tom Girardi has been found guilty on numerous counts of wires fraud after a lengthy trial. The case against Girardi was tried in a federal court in Los Angeles, where he was accused of embezzling tens of millions of dollars from his clients, many of whom were victims of severe physical injuries and families of individuals who had lost their lives in accidents.

The Charges and Trial Proceedings

The trial lasted for 13 days, during which the prosecution presented a mountain of evidence that painted a grim picture of Girardi's alleged wrongdoing. The federal jury deliberated for less than a full day before returning a guilty verdict on four counts of wires fraud.

Tom Girardi, aged 85, is widely known for his previous high-profile legal cases, including representing victims of major disasters against powerful corporations. One such case, against California's Pacific Gas and Electric utility, resulted in a $333 million settlement and was even depicted in the 2000 Julia Roberts film, "Erin Brockovich." However, the once-prominent lawyer's legal empire came crashing down, leading to his disbarment in California in 2022 due to allegations of client theft.

Former clients who testified against Girardi included an Arizona woman whose husband was killed in a boat accident and victims who were burned in a 2010 gas pipeline explosion in San Bruno, south of San Francisco. These clients painted a harrowing picture of the trust they placed in Girardi, only to be betrayed when he allegedly misappropriated their settlement funds.

Public Figure and Defense Strategy

In addition to his legal career, Girardi was known for his appearances on the reality television show "The Real Housewives of Beverly Hills," where he was a notable figure due to his marriage to Erika Jayne, a cast member of the show. This public persona added another layer of complexity to the case, as U.S. Attorney Martin Estrada pointed out in a statement following the verdict:

"Tom Girardi built celebrity status and lured in victims by falsely portraying himself as a 'Champion of Justice.' In reality, he was a Robin-Hood-in-reverse."

The defense team for Girardi sought to deflect blame for the alleged thefts onto the firm's chief financial officer, Chris Kamon, who has been charged separately and has pleaded not guilty. They portrayed Girardi as a mere figurehead in recent years, with a valuable name but little active involvement in the day-to-day operations of the law firm.

Throughout the trial, prosecutors presented compelling evidence to counter the defense's claims. They produced voicemails from Girardi, in which he allegedly provided a series of false explanations for why money awarded by the court to his clients could not be paid. These included fabricated excuses related to tax obligations, debts, and judicial authorizations. Girardi's attorneys also raised the issue of his competency to stand trial, citing a diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease. However, the prosecution contested this assertion, arguing that Girardi was exaggerating his symptoms, and a judge ultimately ruled him competent for trial.

The Aftermath and Sentencing

Having been found guilty, Girardi now faces the prospect of a lengthy prison sentence of up to 80 years. His sentencing is scheduled for December, and he has been granted permission to remain free until the date of his sentencing. The severity of the potential punishment reflects the gravity of the charges and the impact of Girardi's alleged actions on his clients.

Beyond the charges in Los Angeles, Girardi is also facing federal wire fraud charges in Chicago, where he is accused of stealing approximately $3 million from family members of victims of a 2018 Lion Air crash that claimed the lives of 189 individuals. This additional layer of legal troubles further underscores the scope of Girardi's alleged wrongdoing and the potential consequences he may face.

The jury's guilty verdict in Tom Girardi's wires fraud trial marks the culmination of a lengthy legal battle that has captivated the public's attention. The case has highlighted issues of trust, ethics, and accountability within the legal profession, particularly in relation to high-profile attorneys who wield significant influence and power. As the legal proceedings continue to unfold, the implications of this verdict and the broader ramifications for the legal community remain to be seen.

```