Fact-Checking Viral Claims About Donald Trump's Trial in New York

As the historic criminal trial of former President Donald Trump begins in New York, multiple potentially misleading narratives have surfaced on social media. Here's a look at three viral claims that have emerged during the trial and the facts behind them:

On Monday, April 15, Trump expressed concern on Truth Social that Judge Juan Merchan might not allow him to attend his son Barron's graduation in May. While the claim gained traction on social media, Judge Merchan has not made a final decision yet. He signaled openness to the idea but mentioned that it would depend on the trial's schedule and progress. Therefore, the possibility of Trump attending his son's graduation remains under consideration, with a decision pending based on trial proceedings.

Trump's tweet featuring a 2018 letter from Stormy Daniels denying an affair resurfaced on social media, drawing widespread attention. However, it's essential to note that Daniels has since recanted the statement, revealing that she had been coerced into signing and releasing the letter by former Trump attorney Michael Cohen. In an interview on "60 Minutes," Daniels admitted to the affair and explained the circumstances that led to the initial denial, highlighting the pressure exerted on her at the time.

Trump's assertion that Judge Merchan's gag order is unconstitutional has sparked debate. The gag order restricts Trump from discussing specific individuals and their families, aiming to prevent rhetoric that may impede the court's operations. While Trump can still criticize the judge and the district attorney, legal experts argue that the gag order is within the bounds of the law and does not infringe upon Trump's First Amendment rights. Despite his challenge to the order, it currently stands, with a panel set to review his request to lift the restriction on his speech.

Implications of Misleading Claims

These viral claims circulating during Trump's trial underscore the impact of social media's role in shaping public perception. As the trial unfolds, it is crucial for the public to discern the veracity of information and rely on factual evidence rather than potentially misleading narratives.