
Fed Judge Dismisses Defamation Suit Against Fox News by Former US Gov Official
Fox News defamation suit by ex-government official over disinformation board role dismissed. Court ruled in favor of Fox News.

A federal judge has ruled in favor of Fox News, dismissing a defamation lawsuit brought by a former government official. The official, Nina Jankowicz, claimed that the news network had defamed her, leading to online attacks and threats of violence. The judge stated that the majority of the statements in question were about the Disinformation Governance Board on which Jankowicz served, rather than specifically targeting her. The judge further ruled that the one remaining statement, which did reference Jankowicz, was not defamatory as it aligned with the board's official charter.
The Lawsuit
Nina Jankowicz, a former government official, filed a defamation lawsuit against Fox News, alleging that the network's coverage had resulted in defamatory statements and subsequent online harassment and threats directed at her. The lawsuit specifically pointed to the period following the establishment of the Disinformation Governance Board, during which Jankowicz served as a director. The judge emphasized that the alleged defamatory statements predominantly focused on the disinformation board itself, rather than singling out Jankowicz.
The Disinformation Governance Board
The Disinformation Governance Board was initiated by the Department of Homeland Security with the objective of countering misleading information propagated by Russian sources and human smugglers targeting migrants seeking to reach the U.S.-Mexico border. The board's formation was met with criticism from numerous Republican lawmakers and conservative commentators, who raised concerns about potential infringements on free speech.
The Legal Outcome
In response to the judge's decision, Fox News asserted that the lawsuit was politically motivated and an attempt to stifle freedom of speech. The network expressed satisfaction with the court's ruling, citing it as a defense of the First Amendment. The judge's determination that the statements in question, for the most part, pertained to the disinformation board and that the one reference to Jankowicz was consistent with the board's official stance, resulted in the dismissal of the defamation claims.
The outcome of the lawsuit signifies a notable development in the realm of media law and defamation cases. It underscores the importance of contextualizing statements within the broader scope of their subject matter and official representations.
Share news