
Judge Reinstates Fired NLRB Member, Calls Trump's Actions 'Kingly'
A judge reinstated a fired National Labor Relations Board member, ruling President Trump overstepped his authority.

A federal judge delivered a resounding rebuke to former President Donald Trump on Thursday, overturning his firing of National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) member Gwynne Wilcox and emphasizing the limitations of presidential power.
In a scathing ruling issued in U.S. District Court in Washington, D.C., Judge Beryl Howell declared that "an American president is not a king." She reinstated Wilcox to her position on the NLRB, a month after she filed a lawsuit seeking her reinstatement. The judge's decision came as a victory for proponents of checks and balances within the U.S. government.
Trump's Attempt to Overturn Labor Laws Deemed Unlawful
Judge Howell's order explicitly stated that President Trump lacked the authority to terminate NLRB members at will. She characterized his actions against Wilcox as a "blatant violation of the law," highlighting the illegality of Trump's attempt to circumvent the established legal framework governing the NLRB.
The NLRB, established by Congress, plays a crucial role in enforcing U.S. labor laws. Its members are typically appointed for staggered terms, ensuring a degree of independence from political pressures. Wilcox, an appointee of former President Joe Biden, became the first NLRB member ever to be fired by a president.
Political Motivation Behind Wilcox's Firing
Trump replaced Wilcox as chair with another board member on his first day back in the White House. Subsequently, a week later, he terminated her and the NLRB's top lawyer, Jennifer Abruzzo, through a late-night email. In this email, Trump claimed that Wilcox was being removed because "heads of agencies within the Executive Branch must share the objectives of Trump's administration."
However, Judge Howell dismissed Trump's justification as unfounded, stating that his interpretation of his constitutional power was "flat wrong." She emphasized that the president's authority is not absolute and can be limited in specific circumstances, as exemplified by Wilcox's case.
Constitutional Limits on Presidential Power
The ruling serves as a reminder of the constitutional limitations placed on the presidency. Article II of the U.S. Constitution outlines the executive power of the president, but it also acknowledges the separation of powers principle, preventing any one branch of government from accumulating excessive authority.
Judge Howell's forceful language underscores the seriousness of Trump's actions, which she likened to those of a "king" or "dictator." She warned against the dangerous implications of a president who seeks to operate beyond the bounds of the Constitution, emphasizing the importance of upholding democratic norms and principles.
Share news