Kentucky sheriff retires on first-degree murder charge for shooting
A sheriff retired amid a murder charge for allegedly shooting a judge, allowing a successor to protect constituents during legal proceedings.
In a regrettable turn of events, choices made by the Kentucky sheriff have led to serious consequences, forcing a significant change in leadership. On Monday, the attorney representing the sheriff embroiled in a high-profile case, publicly announced the official's immediate retirement. The announcement came in the wake of impending action from the state governor, who threatened to initiate proceedings to remove the sheriff from office.
Retirement amid Legal Standing
The attorney for Shawn “Mickey” Stines, 43, stated that the decision to retire was made with immediate effect. This announcement came on the heels of the first-degree murder charge that Stines is facing in connection with the tragic shooting of Letcher County District Judge Kevin Mullins, which occurred on September 19 at the Whitesburg courthouse. The lawyer emphasized that the decision was not an admission of guilt but a proactive step to allow for a smooth transition in leadership while Stines navigates the legal process ahead.
Imminent Threats and Legal Proceedings
In a letter from the general counsel for Kentucky Governor Andy Beshear, Stines was given a deadline to resign or face removal proceedings. This ultimatum was based on a state law that empowers governors to dismiss peace officers for neglect. In response to the murder charge, Stines entered a plea of not guilty last week, asserting his innocence.
Details surrounding the shooting incident have emerged, revealing that it ensued after an argument, as stated by a spokesperson for the Kentucky State Police, the agency tasked with investigating the matter. However, the agency has refrained from disclosing a potential motive behind the tragic incident. Notably, Stines was deposed just three days before the shooting in connection with a federal lawsuit that accused a deputy of sexual misconduct in Mullins’ office. This legal entanglement has sparked discussions regarding its relevance to the unfortunate incident, with a lawyer for Stines asserting that his position as an elected official shields him from being sued in relation to the allegations.
Share news