Ofqual Chief Urges Caution on Digital Exams Due to Schools' Weak Connectivity and Equity Concerns

Plans for digital exams in England's education system should be approached with "extreme caution," according to Sir Ian Bauckham, the chief regulator at Ofqual, the country's exams regulator. Concerns have been raised over the capability of state schools to implement such assessments due to issues with wifi systems, connectivity, and security that are attributed to insufficient investment in the educational infrastructure.

Concerns and Caution

Sir Ian Bauckham emphasized that it is crucial to exercise extreme caution when considering the digitisation of national exams until there is assurance that all schools can administer digital assessments fairly and without disruption. He noted that there are numerous cautionary tales from other countries that have attempted to digitise their national high-stakes exams, highlighting the potential pitfalls and disadvantages that can arise from such a move.

Context of Digital Exam Proposals

Bauckham's reservations come in light of recent proposals from three major exam boards in England to introduce on-screen assessments. These proposals are currently awaiting regulatory approval from Ofqual. Pearson, the organization that operates the Edexcel exam board, announced plans to offer students the option of taking on-screen GCSE English exams starting in summer 2025. Similarly, OCR revealed its intention to provide a digitally-assessed GCSE in computer science for students commencing their course in 2025. AQA laid out its plans for on-screen exams, with the aspiration of allowing students to take digital exams for at least one major subject by 2030.

Fairness and Infrastructure

Despite the intentions of the exam boards, concerns about infrastructure readiness and fairness persist. Sir Ian highlighted the disparities in school connectivity, wifi systems, system security, and resilience, all of which can significantly impact the fair and smooth execution of digital exams. He emphasized the need to ensure that every school can deliver digital exams effectively and fairly before implementing these assessments on a large scale.

Potential Impact on Students

Sir Ian cautioned against a hasty transition to digitised exams, citing the potential negative impact on students, particularly those from less advantageous backgrounds. He stressed the importance of ensuring that the digital exams work effectively and equitably for all students before proceeding with large-scale implementation.

Advocacy for Cautious Evolution

Various stakeholders in the education sector have weighed in on the matter. James Bowen, assistant general secretary at the school leaders' union NAHT, acknowledged the inevitability of increased technology use in exams but underscored the need for a cautious and thoughtful implementation.

Evolution, Not Revolution

AQA's spokesperson reiterated the commitment to digital exams, emphasizing an evolutionary approach rather than a revolutionary one. The spokesperson acknowledged the necessity of regulatory approval and confirmed that the timelines for the implementation of digital exams are being reviewed in light of the ongoing discussions with schools, colleges, and the regulator.

As the debate over the digitisation of exams continues, it remains clear that the path forward requires careful consideration of the existing challenges and disparities within the educational infrastructure. Sir Ian Bauckham's emphasis on caution and fairness serves as a reminder of the need to prioritize equitable access to digital assessment tools and resources for all schools and students.

```