Ricardo Anaya criticizes low demand for Mexicana de Aviación flights from AIFA

Ricardo Anaya criticizes low demand for Mexicana de Aviación flights from AIFA

Mexicana de Aviación, under the control of the Federal Government, faces criticism from Ricardo Anaya due to the low demand for its flights, with the former presidential candidate claiming that the airline is incurring losses on almost all its trips. Anaya expressed his disapproval in a video posted on social media, stating that the government's decision to create a state-owned airline reflects an outdated mentality and is resulting in financial losses.

Minimal Passenger Numbers

He highlighted specific flights from the Felipe Ángeles International Airport (AIFA) with minimal passenger numbers, such as a flight to Zihuatanejo with nine passengers, another to Palenque with seven, and one to Acapulco with only one passenger. Anaya questioned the sustainability of operating flights with such low passenger counts, emphasizing the significant financial implications for the airline.

Government's Role and Critique

Furthermore, Anaya argued that the government's role should be to support businesses rather than engage in entrepreneurial activities, citing the need to aid small, medium, and large enterprises to enhance their profitability, job creation, and tax contributions. He underlined the significant financial losses incurred by Mexicana de Aviación, comparing the approximate cost of an hour of flight operations with ticket revenue in relation to passenger numbers. Anaya emphasized that the government's focus should be on supporting businesses to thrive and contribute to the economy, rather than assuming ownership or control over them.

Challenges and Passenger Increase

Since resuming operations on December 26, Mexicana de Aviación has experienced a 53% increase in passenger numbers in its first month, marking a significant milestone after a 13-year hiatus. Anaya's critique underscores the challenges faced by the reestablished airline, sparking debate on the government's intervention in the aviation industry and its implications for the broader economic landscape.